« August 2006 | Main | October 2006 »

September 2006 Archives

September 5, 2006

Airline Marketing

"Welcome to our store! We're having a great sale on one of our products. Which one? Why don't you tell me what you're looking for, and when you want to use it, and when you'll be done with it, and then I'll tell you if that's the one on sale."

JetBlue is a really great airline. But their marketing falls into exactly the same trap as all other airlines. They announce "Fly Friendly" fares (or whatever the latest promotion is named) from "as low as $39!" I get a few "sample fares" in a list and then a link to their site. The sample fares never include my home airport so I don't really see how this deal benefits me.

But I'm a sucker, so I click the link to go to their site. There, I am confronted with the list:

From where?
To where?
Departure date?
Return date?

And any one of those four answers can throw me out of the invisible range of their promotion. I have no way to know.

And here's the real thing: if I'm looking on their site in response to a price promotion, it's because I'm interested simply in getting out of town. To go anywhere! Sometime!

Just tell me what places I can go to from my home airport and tell me when I'd have to go, to take advantage of your cute sale. I want the email to show me sample fares from my home airport and then the site to tell me when the available windows are. I can take leave whenever -- when's the best time?

This must be harder than it seems, because none of the discount air travel sites do it. Are they really all just missing the boat?

I tell you. It makes me wanna' go work for JetBlue.

September 13, 2006

Work: Work, work, work

Warning: Long, introspective post coming...

Sometimes people ask me what my job is. Or what's my position with my company. That's increasingly a complex question, but I think the best answer is: "I do whatever needs to be done."

In the last two months, we lost our IT guy and the programmer who had developed one of our key systems. Rather than rehiring those positions, I just sort of took over those duties. So I'm maintaining our email and network and the program that runs one of our services. I'm also still responsible for maintenance on the program I wrote a couple years back that forms the core of our other major service. And the server system it runs on, with the cascading proxies and so forth.

This has been a bad idea, of course, and so I'm working on rehiring both of those positions. I have learned a great deal, though, about those specific areas of our company. I decided to split our internal server into three pieces -- we were running Exchange, our file sharing, and our domain controller all on one box. I outsourced the email to a company that will guarantee uptime and backups, removed the domain controller, and set up a new file sharing computer that's dedicated just to that. So when we get some real IT help back in the company, that person should have a much simpler job.

I'm also the person everybody comes to when they have any other problems. If a client is having a problem, if one of our services isn't working for somebody, if a client asks a tricky question -- I get a visit.

Why did this client just lose all their rankings? Why is this PPC campaign suddenly performing so poorly? How can we write content and optimize a site running this particular, custom CMS? How can we integrate SiteCatalyst into this shopping cart system? What data should this client be tracking to measure the success of this weird type of campaign? How can this client improve their conversion rate?

:o) That's a fun part of my job, actually, because I get to apply the principles I've learned to a lot of different situations and see how they work. It requires a lot of reading and learning and thinking, but then allows a lot of real-world experimenting and testing the things I've learned. Constant refinement. Lots of experience with a wide range of technical and human issues related to marketing and the Internet.

I developed basically (well, literally) all of the services we offer now, so of course I'm the one who understands them best. I built them the way I thought they should run.

And in the meanwhile, I'm also supposed to be researching and developing new products. That piece of my job tends to take a back seat to the more urgent needs. (Franklin Covey is spinning in his grave.) Especially for the last little while, I've been doing a whole lot more maintaining than forging onward. But the industry keeps moving and I've got more than a handful of interesting ideas for us to look at.

So, why the introspection today?

I read about a guy who's getting sued by Microsoft for some very large-scale blackhat SEO, spamming, domain squatting and stuff. He went to BYU and I actually met him once at a conference where I was presenting (ironically, about 'The Right Way to do SEO'). He asked me a couple questions which, in retrospect, fit entirely with what he's been accused of now. I don't usually get upset at people for asking questions, but at the time, he struck me as surprisingly arrogant. (Yes, yes. I know. I'm arrogant, too. But it doesn't surprise me.)

As news broke about this civil suit from Microsoft, this guy posted the following on his blog:

"I'll admit, I've done my share of blackhat stuff online. I continue to do my share of it. As long as it works, I'll continue to do it.

Why?

It works!

Period.

I don't care if you hate me for it.

I got an email today from someone asking how I reconcile splogging with morals.

I don't.

I don't think the two have anything to do with each other.

Why do people feel the need to relate an online marketing tactic with ethics or morals. "

This really resonated with me. The guy graduated from BYU and he's a mormon. He's got a family. He does Internet marketing. In at least those (fairly significant) areas, he's just like me.

We've had lots of people suggest that we do some of those things that this guy is getting sued for. We could easily have done them. I've even worked out ways that we could put our own interesting spin on them. But I've spent most of my career here trying to make sure we do everything right, with the belief that if we do our best and do it right, profit will come.

And profit has come. We're doing very well. I've also been able to teach at BYU, I've learned a lot and developed some great systems (software and otherwise), and I've got a new magazine column in the works. I'm going to be done with my Master's degree classes in December.

Basically, the point is, I'm at a point where I can reevaluate and look at new options. Do I want to move somewhere crazy? Do I want a new job? What kind of job would I enjoy? What could I possibly enjoy more than this? (And yet, I have the distinct impression that there must be something I'd enjoy more than this, because I'm really, really tired of... something about this. I don't know what, though.)

Introspection aside, I'm happy. Life is good. Life is very good.

And I'm going to go to work now. :o)

Government Conspiracies

I know the World Trade Centers couldn't have been brought down by the US government because the government couldn't possibly keep something that big secret. Think about it, have you ever heard of the government being able to keep a secret like that?

(Think about it.)

(Of course I don't actually believe the conspiracy theory. But I do think it's a funny line of reasoning people use to argue that the government couldn't possibly keep it secret. I have a modicum of faith in our government -- both in its capabilities and its intentions.)

September 15, 2006

It Takes a Village to Stop a Car Bomb

Some wars are won with battleships, tanks, and masses of troops. Those wars are the ones that start with tanks or troops. Wars that don't start that way, though, aren't won that way either.

The world wars -- both clashes of massive armies. The first Gulf war -- tanks and planes. The current Iraq mess -- they didn't start with tanks. We brought tanks to a knife fight.

Star Wars. The little X-Wings slipped through the defenses of the Death Star and hit the exposed exhaust port. Sadly, we're acting like the Death Star in many ways. We've got incredible military strength. We can blow up anything we choose.

But the ability to destroy is not going to win this war.

We allied with the British in WW1 and WW2. We're best friends. But during the revolution, they came in like the Big Bad Army and we beat them with a rag-taggy little group of guys with more spirit than training.

Will there be a positive, military outcome to the present conflict in Iraq? Will we one day soon have killed everyone who wants to blow up an American soldier?

Or will someone in Iraq step up and bring harmony? That's what needs to happen.

Like Lord of the Rings. We can try to create an environment in which the right person can step up and solve the problem, but we cannot solve the problem ourselves. We're Aragorn with the big army at the gate. Frodo -- some Iraqi -- needs to take action.

This entry has been a mess of half-developed ideas. I'm refining my own thinking.

September 21, 2006

What Does Google Look At?

The big question is always, "What factors does Google weigh?" What matters to Google?

Of course, they're not publishing the comprehensive list with weights and details. And there's really no way to know what factors Google is actually looking at.

But a good start is to work out what Google can actually see and then figure out might be significant.

So what can Google see?

Here's my approach at a comprehensive list:
============================================
Domains
- length of domain name
- keywords in domain name
- extension (.com, .edu. .tw, .spam)
- hyphens or other nonstandard characters
- registration date
- registration duration
- WHOIS data (physical address, anonymous?, changes?)
- IP addresses referenced

Site-level
- 'discovery date' when Google first saw the site
- number of pages in the site
- number of inbound links to the site
- directory structre
- IP addresses

Page-level
- size of page
- number of scripts, images, css, other external linked/embedded objects
- title
- meta tags
- specific HTML tags (h1, h2, etc.)
- content
- keyword density
- keyword diversity
- link density
- number of inbound links
- anchor text of inbound links
- source of inbound links
- all those link elements for outbound links
- location within site
- inbound links from within the domain (relative prominence within the domain)
- update frequency
- update size
- discovery date

User Activity
- clickthrough rates
- estimated time on page
- bookmarking, social networking data

Competetive Data
- basically all these same factors for other sites/pages targeting same keywords
- update frequency, link popularity, and user activity especially

========================
That's all for now. Got any more? I'll add 'em to the list.

September 22, 2006

LG 550 Fusic - Good and Bad

The Fusic is a fine piece of cell-phonery. However, I've had a couple of problems with it:

1. Sprint didn't activate all of my services when I got my new plan (not a phone issue, fine)
2. When the services were activated, my Photo Albums didn't work at all
3. After I installed the firmware update (after several calls to customer service), the albums worked but...
4. I can't view picture mail that comes from Verizon or any other network (this is a "known issue")
5. The phone includes GPS but to use it I have to pay extra for an application ($5/month)
6. The support for GPS in Java is nonstandard
7. The FM radio broadcast doesn't reach as far as my car antenna, which is on the back of the car
8. The custom, expensive Fusic case covers some of the camera lens

That's about all the bad I can think of offhand. The good?

1. It's easy to put my own mp3 ringtones on it (with some 3rd-party apps and the included USB cable)
2. The screens are clear and bright, to me
3. I can watch streaming TV with it
4. It has full web support so I can write my own web portal with bookmarks, RSS, etc.
5. It works okay as a cell phone -- quality is still not as good as a landline with Qwest, but it's not awful
6. Some have complained about the included 'themes' but I like them just fine

I don't have "texting" so I can't address that -- it seems like it would be a cool thing, but it's a value-added service that, like almost everything else, I'd have to pay more for.

There's my $.01.

September 29, 2006

IP Addressing and Anonymity

This is how secret you are:

This nifty tool grabs the IP address your computer is using and connects it to Google Maps to show right where you are.

How close is it? It zeroed in on me at work really well.

If you want to appear to be somewhere else, check out TOR. (Google it.)

September 30, 2006

Great Quote RE: Microsoft's Solitaire is Cheating

``Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.''

~Napoleon Bonaparte

About September 2006

This page contains all entries posted to Tom Dalton :: Doer of Good in September 2006. They are listed from oldest to newest.

August 2006 is the previous archive.

October 2006 is the next archive.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.